Random Post: DIY silent hard drive mounting
RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  •  

    bacula-2.0.3-4 Etch Backport

    For a lot of (good) reasons, I run Debian Stable (etch) on all my servers. For various other reasons, I need to run a newer version of bacula than what is included in the etch tree (1.38.11).

    With that in mind, I have backported bacula-2.0.3-4 from Debian Testing (lenny) and set up an apt repository for anyone else who needs it.

    To use the repository, add the following lines to your /etc/apt/sources.list:

    deb http://backports.millbrookprinting.com/ etch main contrib non-free
    deb-src http://backports.millbrookprinting.com/ etch main contrib non-free

    Be aware that I offer no guarantee on the packages I backport. Also keep in mind that this repository is for etch i386, amd64, all, and source. No other branches or architectures are included at this time. If there is enough demand, I may include others.

    10 Responses to “bacula-2.0.3-4 Etch Backport”

    1. Stephane Says:

      Hi!

      i386 debs not present in your repository. Normal?

    2. jcl Says:

      Stephane: Looks like I accidentally removed the i386 packages at some point. I only have one machine of that architecture so I didn’t notice. It’s now fixed.

      Thanks for the heads up!

    3. powerpc arch added to backports at pixelchaos.net Says:

      [...] Archives « bacula-2.0.3-4 etch backport [...]

    4. Stephane Says:

      http://www.backports.org/ now have an Etch section. You can may be load our backports on? I’m sure that many people will be happy.

      No plan to build a Sarge backport too?

      Stephane

    5. jcl Says:

      Stephane,

      Sorry, I have no plans to backport any packages to sarge at this time.

    6. Ingo Says:

      Hi jd,

      I like to use your backport for bacula on a etch system.
      But as I give it a try I will get a huge list of packages which get updated too. Thats not what I liked.
      Is there anything special I need to take care ?
      Especially the libc6 seems to be a problem with the version.

      Ingo

    7. jcl Says:

      Ingo,

      The bacula packages are the only thing currently available in my backports repository. Are you sure you dont have sources for lenny listed in your sources.list?

      For libc6 and bacula-fd specifically, the version in my repository requires libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1). Etch has libc6 2.3.6.ds1-13 currently.

      I’m guessing that your system is trying to upgrade itself to lenny according to how your sources.list is set up?

    8. Ingo Says:

      jd,

      you are absolutelly right.
      There was an additional line in my sources.list which didn’t say etch.

      Now it worked fine.
      Thank you very much.

      Ingo

    9. 19 Says:

      Hi,
      Bacula 2.2.5 is out, many bugs were closed and this release looks very interesting…
      bacula 2.2.5-1 debs are available for sid.
      We run your bacula version on etch servers and would like to continue :) Are you planning to backport bacula 2.2.4 or 2.2.5?

      Keep on the good job!

    10. jcl Says:

      19,

      Yes. I actually began work on this a few days ago. There are some significant issues to deal with concerning dependencies, etc.

      I will post a new blog entry when the backport is ready.

      Thanks for your interest (and your patience)

    Leave a Reply